Pages

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

German Shepard Puppy Murdered

Chantel's Opinion on this story: I just don't understand what posses these monsters to do such horrible acts to these loving innocent animals!! I hope they give him the max and then some!!!!! We need tougher Animal Cruelty laws!!


By Rob Quinn,  Newser Staff


Posted Apr 29, 2011 9:20 AM CDT 





(Newser) – An animator who helped bring lovable creatures to life in movies like Kung Fu Panda and Madagascar 2 has been arrested for what Humane Society workers describe as one of the worst cases of animal abuse they've ever seen. DreamWorks employee Young Song is accused of shooting his neighbor's muzzled German Shepherd puppy with a pellet gun and then beating it to death with a hammer, reports the New York Daily News. Song has pleaded not guilty to a felony count of animal cruelty that carries up to four years in jail, though the incident was captured on surveillance video. "When our officers first viewed the videotape, one of our officers had tears in his eyes. He'd never seen anything like this before," the head of the Pasadena Humane Society tells the Los Angeles Times. "In my 31 years at this animal shelter I've never seen anything like this."

Drunk Puppy

By Evann Gastaldo,  Newser Staff





 Posted Jan 5, 2012 1:13 PM CST 

 

 (Newser) – Attention dog owners: Next time you're drinking vodka and Coke, don't leave your glass on the floor. Matthew Cox, 26, did just that, went outside to have a cigarette, and returned to find that his 6-month-old Labrador puppy, Max, had finished his drink for him. The Brit was too drunk to help the swaying puppy, and ended up leaving him with his roommate when he went out to DJ, the BBC reports. Now Cox has been banned from having a dog for three years, and Max has found a new home.
Police were alerted to the situation by two girls who saw Max, staggering and falling, outside stores near Cox's home. Officers later found Max at Cox's home, the Daily Mail reports. They brought him to a vet for emergency treatment, where he was put on an IV drip for nearly a full day to recover. Cox pleaded guilty to failure to ensure an animal's welfare, and the judge who handed down the three-year ban called his actions "just downright stupid."

Chantel's View on Animal Cruelty



In creating Equalrights4animals.blogspot.com, I wanted to find out the pros and cons on animal rights. Opinion is a strong motivation in the things that we are truly passionate about. I am an animal lover in all rights of the word "lover" and I know that we are a society that raises animals for consumption. Even though they are going to be killed, I do not think it is right or ethical to raise the animals in the way that they are being raised. I lose a little more faith in humanity every time I hear of an animal being abused especially when it is a family a pet. All animals have rights and should be treated as such.

Monday, February 20, 2012








PETA was founded in 1980 and is dedicated to establishing and defending the rights of all animals. PETA operates under the simple principle that animals are not ours to eat, wear, experiment on, or use for entertainment. PETA educates policymakers and the public about animal abuse and promotes kind treatment of animals. PETA is an international nonprofit charitable organization based in Norfolk, Virginia, with affiliates worldwide.

PETA believes that animals have rights and deserve to have their best interests taken into consideration, regardless of whether they are useful to humans. Like you, they are capable of suffering and have an interest in leading their own lives.

The very heart of all of PETA's actions is the idea that it is the right of all beings—human and nonhuman alike—to be free from harm. Our world is plagued with many serious problems, all of which deserve our attention. Cruelty to animals is one of them. We believe that all people should try to stop animal abuse whenever and wherever they can.
Since 1980, PETA has campaigned to establish a global society in which humans consider the needs of what Henry Beston, noted American writer and naturalist of the mid-20th century, so beautifully called "the other nations." We uphold the rights of individual animals to be respected. For most, that means simply leaving them alone.

PETA focuses its attention on the four areas in which the largest numbers of animals suffer the most intensely for the longest periods of time: on factory farms, in laboratories, in the clothingtrade, and in the entertainment industry. In today's world of virtually unlimited choices, animal exploitation is simply unacceptable. We can eat better, educate ourselves better, clothe ourselves better, and entertain ourselves better without torturing and killing animals.
We have the power to spare animals excruciating pain by making better choices about the food we eat, the things we buy, and the activities we support

For more information on PETA
Information from the Site: FOR THE LOVE OF PETBULLS


Here are some things to consider:

"Pit bull" is not a breed, but a "type" that encompasses several registered breeds and crossbreeds. Therefore, statistics that claim "Pit bulls" are responsible for some percentage of attacks are lumping many separate breeds together, then comparing that to other dogs that are counted as individual breeds.
  • Breed identification is left up to victim and witness testimony, and is often wrong. Due to negative press, biting dogs of almost ANY breed have been called "Pit bulls". Try this little quiz for fun: Find the Pit Bull See how many people you know can pick out a pit bull from pictures, let alone in the middle of an attack.
  • Search the Center for Disease Control site. Even the CDC supports the position that irresponsible owners, not breed, are the chief cause of dog bites. They have done studies that indicate that the most "dangerous breed" of dog changes with popularity and reputation.
  • Search the American Temperament Test Society. Pit bulls have an average score that beats even the "ultimate family dog", the Golden Retriever.
  • Positive pit bull press - This site shows not only what the breed is about, but the difference responsible ownership makes. Many of these pages are "Pit bull rescue makes good" stories. This site features, among other great stuff, rescue pits that are saving human lives in Search and Rescue and US Customs Service.
  • The Diane Whipple case. One of the first times the owner has been held responsible for the actions of their dog. Note that the breed involved was the Perro de Presa Canario (Canary Dog) from Spain, yet the brunt of the negative press again targeted the pit bull, an all but unrelated breed. Clearly the message is lets stop targeting the dogs! Pit Bulls are no more dangerous than any other strong and large dog. They just happen to attract more irresponsible and abusive owners than any other breed... Ironically, by portraying them in a negative way, the media and breed legislators only make them irresistibly attractive to individuals with bad intentions. Do Pit Bull haters really think that after banning the breed all the criminals who use these dogs as weapons will own Basset Hounds? And if they did, how long do you think it would take before Basset Hounds start making the news?
  • A breed ban will only remove Pit Bulls from the good people's homes and leave them in the hands of animal abusers who couldn't care less about the law... Better think twice before supporting such measure...

 Article published by: Bless the Bullys


Peaceful protest in Memphis, TN to oppose “kill all pit bulls” mandate

A city leader in Memphis, TN was recorded telling employees at the Memphis Animal Shelter to “kill all the pit bulls, or any dog that looks like a pit bull.” This is the latest in a string of unethical and disturbing news related to what takes place at Memphis shelter. Not long ago, we learned that the Detroit, Michigan shelter had the same policy with respect to pit bulls. A controversy was sparked there by Ace, an emaciated, abandoned stray pit bull euthanized because of his breed despite the pleas of many to help him. Concerned and outraged citizens and organizations took a stand to oppose the mass killing of a specific breed at the Detroit Metro shelter, and because of this, talks are in the works to change that policy. Memphis area residents have the opportunity to make the same change. Concerned residents must make their voices heard regarding the Memphis shelter’s biased policy to “kill all pit bulls.” In that regard, SOS Memphis, a group supporting reform of the Memphis shelter, is planning a peaceful protest on Sunday, February 19, 2012 at 2:00 p.m. at the corner of Poplar Avenue and Highland. Anyone seeking additional information should contact: info@sosmemphis.com.
A more detailed video is included with the link to this article.

Should we Euthanize Pit Bulls?
Updated: Thursday, 16 Feb 2012, 10:34 PM CST
Published : Thursday, 16 Feb 2012, 10:34 PM CST

Memphis, Tn – A high-ranking Memphis city leader was recorded telling employees at the Memphis Animal Shelter to “kill all the pit bulls, or any dog that looks like a pit bull.” The recording has been leaked on the web leaving animal advocates outraged. 270 pit bulls were reportedly killed by the shelter in November.
A doctor from the shelter’s advisory board even admitted they were killing almost all the pit bulls taken in and hardly put them up for adoption. Pit bulls may have a bad rap, but is this type of mass murder of a breed acceptable?  Heather Long from VetTV.net joined Ernie Freeman to discuss.

http://www.myfoxmemphis.com/dpp/news/local/10pm/should-we-euthanize-pit-bulls-mfo-20120216

Monday, February 13, 2012

Act to Prevent Dogs from Running At Large

I found this article about an act to prevent Dogs from running at large. Read this Act and give your opinion.

Found image on Google Images



To address problems concerning protection of public safety, overpopulation and unwanted animals, and reinforcement of responsible guardianship of dogs with regard to ownership of both male and female dogs. Dogs that are left to run at large (unleashed) are a hazard to the community and its citizens with the potential to harm unwary citizens through acts of aggression, threatening behavior and damage to property. It is the interests of the community to regulate the latitude given to dogs and their caretakers to roam without proper supervision in public areas.


Section 2. Confinement of dogs

Any person owning, harboring, or controlling a male or female dog whether vaccinated or unvaccinated, licensed or unlicensed, sterilized or unsterilized, shall always keep such animal from running at large by either: (A) Securely confining such animal within an adequate fence or enclosure, or within a house, garage, or other building or (B) Accompanying the animal on a leash.

Section 3. Definitions

For the purposes of this section, "secure confinement" means securing the dog in an area from which the dog cannot escape based on the size and breed of the dog, while providing for the humane care of the animal while in confinement. (A) Specifications (1) Any dogs confined within a fenced yard must have an adequate space for exercise based on a dimension of at least one hundred (100) square feet. Provided, further that where dogs are kept or housed on property without a fenced yard, the owner of such dogs or persons having custody of such dogs shall provide an enclosure for such dogs meeting the one hundred (100) square feet dimension. Such enclosure shall be constructed of chain link or other material that permits adequate ventilation, with all sides enclosed. The enclosure shall be of sufficient height to prevent the dog from escaping from such enclosure. The top of such enclosure shall be covered with materials to provide the dog with shade and protection from the elements. Dogs shall not be chained, tied, fastened or otherwise tethered to dog houses, trees, fences or other stationary objects as a means of confinement to property.

Section 4. Penalties

Whoever, being an owner, harborer, or possessor of any dog, allows such dog to remain at large shall be fined ____. For any subsequent offense occurring within twelve months of a prior offense, the dog owner, harborer, or possessor shall pay a reasonable fine and have the animal spayed or neutered within seven days of the redemption, if the dog has not already been rendered sterile. Verification from the veterinarian performing the surgery shall be provided to the Division in writing within seven days of the surgery.

Additional Commentary

Several city and state laws prohibit dogs from running at large. One common problem surfaces in each law: only female dogs are required to be confined while they are in heat, estrus, breeding condition, or copulating season. City counselors and state legislators must think about the meaning behind the phrase, "It takes two to tango." Prohibiting only female dogs from running at large does not fully address the concerns behind a running at large statute.

Many laws prohibiting female dogs from running at large are intended to prevent unwanted animals. Controlling animal overpopulation helps communities save money by lessening the need to control surplus animals. However, these laws singling out female dogs fail to recognize the necessity to prevent male dogs from roaming, finding, and impregnating confined female dogs in heat. An unneutered male animal is likely to roam the neighborhood and may even run away, according to Drs. Foster and Smith1 , in order to find a confined female dog in heat. According to the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), in six years one female dog and her offspring can be the source of 67,000 puppies.

By preventing dogs from roaming at large, the current laws are also meant to keep people and the animals themselves safe. Individuals are less likely be bitten and/or attacked by animals that are leased or confined and closely supervised by their caretakers. In addition to concerns about human safety, dogs running at large could possibly be killed by cars, subjected to abuse, or get hurt by other animals.

Running at large statutes are also meant to reinforce responsible pet care. Securing a pet in a safe place or walking a dog on a leash will reduce the potential anguish and expense of losing a loved pet. Confinement must be humane for the animal as well as secure and safe. Both unsterilized and sterilized dogs should be required to be confined under the law, as the law is intended to address concerns regarding safety as well as population control. It is important for individuals to take responsibility for dogs in their control


   



Visit: www.arconference.org


Animal Rights 2012 is the U.S. animal rights movement's annual national conference. It is also the world's largest and longest-running animal rights gathering, hailing back to 1981. It is the only conference open to all points of view on achieving animal liberation.

The conference will be held on August 2-5th at the Hilton Alexandria Mark Center Hotel, just South of Washington DC. The address is 5000 Seminary Rd, Alexandria, VA 22311.

   HIGHLIGHTS

  • 80 speakers from 60 organizations
  • 100 sessions: animal abuse, organizing, tactics, issues
  • Eyewitness reports on key campaigns
  • 90 exhibits (free & open to the public)
  • 40 videos, including premieres
  • "Newcomer Orientation"
  • Nightly networking receptions
  • Awards Banquet on Saturday evening
  • "Celebration of Animal Rights" on Sunday evening
  • Lobbying and other special actions on Monday
  • Highly discounted sleeping rooms and meals
  • Free morning & evening vegan snacks